If Ten Percent Refuse the Test it's Over!

This was written by Pennsylvania parent Michele Gray. Be sure to check out her blog .

If we can just help parents overcome their fear of saying No to testing, their fear of what will happen if their school doesn't make AYP, we can end this all now. Only 10% of parents and/or kids have to decline testing and it's over. The 10% isn't some mystical 100-monkeys number.

According to psychometricians, if the tests fail to test the same percentage each year, all the stats are invalid. That's why there is extreme pressure on schools to test 100% and why there is the threat of failing if the percentage for the whole school OR for any measurable subgroup falls below 95%. In fact, for small rural schools, their scores are statistically meaningless anyway, but they still have to take the test, or else we could all sue under the equal protection clause.

[U.S. Education Secretary] Arne Duncan said earlier this week that the Dept of Ed predicts 82% of schools will fail this year no matter what we do. So why not force the schools to fail because parents and kids say NO to testing rather than putting the burden and the blame on kids with special needs, living in poverty, struggling with English, and so on. That's just wrong. In fact, it's evil.

I also highly recommend the book "Making the Grades" by Todd Farley. It's been recommend by Alfie Kohn and Jonathan Kozol. It's very readable, very funny and after reading it no parent in their right mind will ever let their child be subjected to these tests ever again.

It's insane that we are allowing our children to be subjected to a full two weeks or more of these pointless tests that only enrich the private for-profit testing industry. I remember taking the SATs or GREs took a couple of hours on a Saturday morning, back when it was just ETS [Educational Testing Services]. Now it's multi-national companies like Pearson (in which Qaddafi is major investor; Qadaffi and NCLB Testing ) or McGraw-Hill or DRC that are draining millions of education dollars into the pockets of CEOs while our kids tests are scored by temps. [Read: The Loneliness of the Long-Distance Test Scorer ] Farley recently sent this to me:

"Last summer, before she lost her job, [D.C. Chancellor of schools, Michelle] Rhee was arguing for even MORE standardized tests in the DC schools. As a parent, she said, she "wanted to know how her kids are doing...." To me, that is the fundamental problem with standardized testing: In my opinion, we don't know anything about the kids at all. We score their open-ended responses in sweatshop like conditions, bored out of our skulls, item by item. We never, in other words, get a feel for a whole human being, just random words on a page.

The multiple choice questions are either too simplistic or pretend they are too complex, as if you could get some understanding of a child's understanding about literary characterization (or whatever) in multiple choice format. As far as I'm concerned this whole thing is a great deal for big business, but that's it.

If Michelle Rhee really wanted to know "how her kids are doing," all she needs do is ask the friggin' human being standing at the front of their classroom, the person who hears her kids' answers (and thought processes) every day, who knows how hard those kids work or how they play together, etc etc."

Michele also has a blog called: Leaving Behind the PSSA Here's an excerpt from a recent letter to Michael Hardy,  superintendent of State College Area School District.

"We are told that private for-profit companies can do a better job than you and others who are committed to public education because of the free market. The free market resulted in scandals ranging from Halliburton and Blackwater in Iraq, to the Enron debacle, to the recent outrage in our own backyard with private for-profit prisons for kids.

When our tax dollars are involved, greed and corruption run rampant in the “free market.” Please think about your role in this and if there is anything you can do to take a stand against the Big Lie that is NCLB and high-stakes standardized testing which threatens the future of the kids you serve."

Visit her Facebook page: NCLB Testing: Stop the Madness Know the Truth

It's harder now that it's over

The fight for Friday Fun at Meeker has officially been lost.   Students, teachers and parents have been overruled in their efforts to retain a 30 minute a week non-academic enrichment program.  After months of meetings, collecting signatures in support of the program(343!), talking with other parents, and finally, formally appealing to the school board, the answer is no.    Dr. Ranelle Lang, superintendent, and Dr. Dana Selzer, chief academic officer for D6, met with another parent and I to inform us of their decision.

Honestly, this meeting was good.  Dr. Lang and Dr. Selzer were friendly, respectful and very straightforward in explaining to us the reasons for the denial.  Some of the reasons were expected; CSAP scores, no time for it in the schedule, etc.  Others included factors I had not considered; can't add the time on Mondays because of the contract with the Greeley Education Association and the actual number of instructional hours in each day after lunch, recess, specials, transition periods, etc., is only 5 1/2 to devote to the core subjects.

Dr. Lang made clear that her job is the academic success of the students in the district.  This is her focus.  It's obvious to me that we have a superintendent who cares deeply about making that happen.  The path she has chosen to take the district in is one that she believes will bring that success; success as defined by our state and federal government and even within the perceptions of the general population.  She told us that almost every minute of the school day needs to be used for academic instruction.  Dr. Lang did not mince words when she acknowledged she is responsible to the community, the school board, and the state for our CSAP scores.  Indeed, that is a heavy weight.

I was able to put myself in her shoes as a result of the conversation.  Even the most powerful administrator in the district is held captive by CSAP, for better or worse.  Obviously, in my opinion, it's  for the worse.   Although I understand the reasons given for denying Friday Fun, the fact remains that we're talking about 30 minutes a week.  I still don't believe it's too much to ask.  I absolutely believe there is a place for non academic, free form enrichment in a school setting and that it's really essential to academic success.

Imagine how valuable that time might be for a struggling student who has had all the literacy and math he can stomach for the week.  It's a chance to try something new, think in a different way, find something else he's good at, latch on to something that he can find value in right now!  How might that affect his future schooling?  If he has been given the opportunity to explore content areas that aren't measurable on any test and he excels at those things, it might really give him a sense of belonging in school and boost his confidence.

I'm beginning to understand, in a way I didn't before, that Friday Fun was never going to happen.  The stakes are too high, the path too narrow, the consequenses too dire(especially with the inevitable advent of teachers being evaluated on their students' CSAP scores).   While it is within Dr. Lang's power to give us Friday Fun, I can see from her point of view why she wouldn't.  I disagree, but I feel like I understand her better.

This is public education.  This is the machine.  And I'm worried that it won't get any better in terms of educating children in ways that honor them as creative, inquisitive people, no matter what the test scores are.  When I say it's harder now that the fight for Friday Fun is over, it's because I realize that it will take so many people to change the system.   We are all responsible for what's happening.  We've elected the politicians that have started this ball rolling.  We parents and community members rely far too much on standardized tests to tell us if schools are good or not.  We've all demanded accountability.    This, right here, is the result.  30 minutes a week of engaging, exciting learning for kids, gone.   It's the definition of unintended consequences.

What if??

I came across this article about what might happen if whole communities refused to let their kids take the state standardized tests.  In our case, CSAP.

It's interesting to think about.  As a parent, I'm coming to realize that most of the things I dislike about our public schools are a direct result of the emphasis of this test.  And that's not a knock against our school board, not really.  I understand they are under extreme pressure from the federal and state government to tailor our school system to get "results".   That is, increasing test scores.

A narrow curriculum, limited recess and hands on learning time, no time for teachers to grab hold of teachable moments and elaborate on what may perk students' interest, one size fits all lesson plans that teachers have no control over, kids learning to read but not learning to love reading...these are all consequences of teaching to the test.  So what do we do?  Children could be getting a better education if the government just backed off.    Private schools are not held hostage to government mandates and can teach their students in meaningful ways.  Why should that type of education be a privilege?